Don’t greenwash: fund managers must be careful how they talk about ESG

Published 07/10/2022
Author image
Greenwashing is deceptive, unethical, unprofessional, and comes with many risks. Let’s look at 4 of these risks through a commercial lens and what it means for fund managers.
Article cover

To greenwash, or not to greenwash? That is the question. Green, sustainable, ethical, responsible, environmentally-friendly… these are all words used by managers to describe their funds. As both investors and the wider world become increasingly concerned with sustainability, it is tempting to exaggerate a fund’s ESG credentials to attract more capital.

This, however, is a terrible idea. 

Misleading investors on ESG isn’t just unethical, it’s bad business practice. Whether intentional or not, managers committing this marketing sin expose themselves to a host of commercial and regulatory risks – which, themselves, have commercial consequences.  

Let’s consider four of these risks through a commercial lens. After all, a manager’s belief that when they do greenwash it will help them raise more capital is what tempts them into it in the first place. 

  1. Investing is a relationship business – especially in the private markets – and relationships are built on trust. Honest and authentic communication is vital. By overemphasising the greenness of a fund, you are undermining the trust on which your relationship is being built. 
  2. Sustainable investing was once associated with forfeiting or compromising on returns. For most investors this is no longer the case. Now, performance and ESG are seen to go hand in hand. By claiming your fund is greener than it really is, you are misleading investors looking to capture that performance. You are committing the fund to ESG-related performance outcomes which are unlikely to be met. Investors will not forget that disappointment. 
  3. Marketing is a competition for time and attention. Winning this competition requires differentiation and authenticity. Differentiation is nigh on impossible when your ESG statements are clichéd and unless your ESG writing is authentic – based on the things, unique to your firm, you have really done or are planning to do – it will almost certainly be clichéd. Marketing that isn’t effective is wasted time, money and effort. 
  4. Greenwashing is now a key area of focus for regulators; scrutiny and fines are likely to increase. Recently, the SEC fined BNY Mellon’s Investment Adviser $1.5m for “misstatements and omissions” about its ESG considerations, and the German asset manager DWS was raided by police officers following claims of greenwashing. Nobody wants to have a conversation with their investors about why they were fined… 

So, if you must not greenwash, how should you communicate around ESG? 

Investors are more likely to believe your positive ESG claims when you are also seen to own up to the challenges, past, present and future. Being honest about your ESG journey is vital to building trust with your clients and ensuring your overall fund marketing is believable. Far better to show an authentic direction and speed of ESG travel, than make unfounded claims that will easily be debunked. 

Reach out if you need help – MJ Hudson has a team of 70 ESG specialists with a direct link into our Investor relation and marketing solutions team. We can assist with everything from ESG assessment, frameworks, and regulations through to how to best communicate all of this to your investors. 

Get the best content from Converge direct to your inbox every month.
Author image

About The Author

We help fund managers and investors operate efficiently and invest successfully. Working with fund managers, investors and advisers in both traditional and alternative assets, our team works for clients managing and advising £700bn of assets. Our services include law, fund management solutions, international administration, investment advisory, and IR & marketing.